From OWL Test Cases
|Status||Approved (2009-07-02 when passed by two or more implementations) (proposed 2009-06-08)|
|Author||Jeremy J. Carroll|
|Syntactic Species/Profile||OWL 2 DL (EL, QL, RL)|
|Semantics||This test is applicable under both direct and RDF-based semantics.|
| Consistent ontology (download)
Convert syntax: functional, XML, Manchester This informative conversion will be incorrect for OWL 2 Full. info.pngConversions are provided by the OWL Syntax Converter which tries to "repair" OWL 2 Full inputs to become DL.
The version of this test approved by the WebOnt WG was incorrect. The input ontology present in that version of the test was marked as an OWL Lite document, but was not OWL Lite because it did not contain a triple of the form O rdf:type owl:Ontology. The ontology has been revised to contain the necessary triple.
OWL EL Report (Informative)
Ontology satisfies the constraints of OWL EL.
OWL QL Report (Informative)
Ontology satisfies the constraints of OWL QL.
OWL RL Report (Informative)
Ontology satisfies the constraints of OWL RL.