TestCase:WebOnt-I5.26-010
From OWL Test Cases
| [Download OWL] | |
| Test Id | WebOnt-I5.26-010 |
|---|---|
| Description | The abstract syntax form of the conclusions is:
EquivalentClasses( restriction( first:p, minCardinality(1) ) ) ObjectProperty( first:p ) This is trivially true given that first:p is an
|
| Status | Approved (2009-05-20, when passed by 2 implementations) (proposed 2009-05-13) |
| Author | Jeremy J. Carroll |
| Original syntax | RDF-XML |
| Syntactic Species/Profile | OWL 2 Full (not EL, not QL, not RL) |
| Semantics | This test is applicable under the RDF-based semantics. It should not be considered under the direct semantics because it does not satisfy the syntactic constraints of OWL 2 DL. |
| WebOnt test | http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I5.26/Manifest010#test |
| Premise ontology (download)
Convert syntax: functional, XML, Manchester This informative conversion will be incorrect for OWL 2 Full. info.pngConversions are provided by the OWL Syntax Converter which tries to "repair" OWL 2 Full inputs to become DL. | |
| <rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:first="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I5.26/premises010#" xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I5.26/premises010" > <owl:Ontology/> <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:ID="p" /> </rdf:RDF> | |
| Conclusion ontology (download)
Convert syntax: functional, XML, Manchester This informative conversion will be incorrect for OWL 2 Full. info.pngConversions are provided by the OWL Syntax Converter which tries to "repair" OWL 2 Full inputs to become DL. | |
| <rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I5.26/conclusions010" > <owl:Ontology/> <owl:Restriction rdf:nodeID="n"> <owl:onProperty> <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="premises010#p" /> </owl:onProperty> <owl:minCardinality rdf:datatype= "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#int" >1</owl:minCardinality> </owl:Restriction> </rdf:RDF> | |
| Imported ontologies | none |
Note: The above conclusion ontology does not have a representation in functional-style syntax or the OWL object model. In fact, the RDF-to-FS mapping is simply undefined for this graph. Consequently, the test cannot be in OWL DL or in any profile (since the profiles refer to functional-style syntax only). The OWL API still wrongly claims this since the offending triple are simply ignored, leading to an empty ontology. There is a bug report on this behaviour.
