From OWL Test Cases

Jump to:navigation, search

[Edit query] | Show embed code


Previous     Results 1– 20     Next        (20 | 50 | 100)
author description species QL EL RL I C P N
Datatype-restrictions-different-types Birte Glimm The individual a must have dp fillers that are in the sets {3, 4} and {2, 3} (different types are used, but shorts and ints are integers). Furthermore, the dp filler must be 3, but since 3 is in both sets, the ontology is consistent. Test:DL
Test:FULL
0- 0- 0- 0 1X 0 0
Double-ranges Birte Glimm The data property dp has a restriction to doubles >= 5 (given as byte) and <= 7.2 (given as float) and a restriction to decimals >= 6.0 (given as float) and <= 6.8. The individual a is required to have a dp successor, but there are several double values that fulfil the restriction. Test:DL
Test:FULL
0- 0- 0- 0 1X 0 0
Numeric-restrictions-different-type Birte Glimm The data property dp has a restriction to bytes >= 5 (4.5 needs to be rounded up) and <= 7 and a restriction to decimals >= 6.0 and <= 6.8. The individual a is required to have a dp successor, but 6 is a value that fulfils both restrictions. Test:DL
Test:FULL
0- 0- 0- 0 1X 0 0
Restrictions-different-type Birte Glimm The individual a must have dp fillers that are in the sets {3.0 (float), 4 (integer)} and {3.0 (decimal)} (different types are used, but 3.0 has the same value for floats and decimals). Furthermore, the dp filler must be an integer <= 3, but since 3.0 has the same value as 3 the ontology is consistent. Test:DL
Test:FULL
0- 0- 0- 0 1X 0 0
Owlreal-plus-oneOf Birte Glimm The individual a must have either negative Infinity or 0 (-0 as integer is 0) as dp fillers and all dp successors must be from owl:real, which excludes negative infinity, but allows 0. Test:DL
Test:FULL
0- 0- 0- 0 1X 0 0
Consistent-dataproperty-disjointness Birte Glimm The datatype properties dp1 and dp2 are disjoint, but the individual a can have 10 as a filler for dp1 and 18 as filler for dp2, which satisfies the disjointness. Test:DL
Test:FULL
0- 0- 0- 0 1X 0 0
Consistent-dateTime Birte Glimm The datatype restrictions leave exactly one dateTime value as dp filler for the individual a, so the ontology is consistent. Test:DL
Test:FULL
0- 0- 0- 0 1X 0 0
Consistent-integer-filler Birte Glimm The individual a is in the extension of the class A, which implies that it has a hasAge filler of 18 as integer, which is consistent with the all values from integer assertion for a. Test:DL
Test:FULL
0- 0- 0- 0 1X 0 0
Contradicting-datatype-restrictions Birte Glimm The individual a is in A and thus must have a dp filler that is an integer >= 4. Furthermore the dp fillers must be in the set {3, 4} and in the set {2, 3}. Although 3 is in both sets, 3 is not >= 4, which causes the inconsistency. Test:DL
Test:FULL
0- 0- 0- 1X 0 0 0
Contradicting-dateTime-restrictions Birte Glimm The individual a must have a dp filler that is a date from 2007, but the restrictions on dp allow only values from 2008, which makes the ontology inconsistent. Test:DL
Test:FULL
0- 0- 0- 1X 0 0 0
Datatype-DataComplementOf-001 Mike Smith Demonstrates that the complement of a datatype contains literals from other datatypes. Test:DL
Test:FULL
0- 0- 0- 0 1X 0 0
Datatype-Float-Discrete-001 Mike Smith The value space of xsd:float is discrete, shown with range defined on 0x00000000 and 0x00000001 Test:DL
Test:FULL
0- 0- 0- 1X 0 0 0
Datatype-Float-Discrete-002 Mike Smith The value space of owl:real is continuous, in contrast with xsd:float Test:DL
Test:FULL
1QL 1EL 1RL 0 1X 0 0
Datatype-restriction-min-max-inconsistency Birte Glimm The individual a is supposed to have an integer dp-successor >= 18, but all dp-successors must be <= 10, which is impossible. Test:DL
Test:FULL
0- 0- 0- 1X 0 0 0
Different-types-plus-complement Birte Glimm The individual a must have dp fillers that are in the sets {3, 4} and {2, 3} (different types are used, but shorts and ints are integers), but at the same time 3 is not allowed as a dp filler for a, which causes the inconsistency. Test:DL
Test:FULL
0- 0- 0- 1X 0 0 0
Different-types Birte Glimm The individual a must have dp fillers that are in the sets {3.0 (double), 4 (integer)} and {2 (integer, 3.0 (decimal)}. The value 3 is the only one that fulfils these constraints, but since a must also have a dp filler that is not 3, the ontology is inconsistent. Test:DL
Test:FULL
0- 0- 0- 1X 0 0 0
Direct Semantics Literal disjoint from Thing Alan Ruttenberg A test demonstrating that literals are disjoint from Thing in the direct semantics. See thread at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2010Oct/0116.html. The following ontology, which is consistent according to the Direct Semantics, demonstrates that literals are not OWL things. In it, owl:Thing is an enumerated class containing at most 2 individuals. One of those individuals has three data property literal values 42,43,44 ^xsd:integer. If the literals were instance of owl:Thing, this ontology would be inconsistent as there can be only two distinct members of owl:Thing, but there are three distinct literals. On the date this test was entered, Pellet and Fact+ correctly determined that the ontology is consistent and Hermit acknowledged that while it found the ontology inconsistent, this was a bug. Test:DL
Test:FULL
0- 0- 0- 0 1X 0 0
Disjoint Props via Disjoint Domains Sebastian Rudolph Two properties having disjoint domains are necessarily disjoint themselves. Test:DL
Test:FULL
0- 1EL 1RL 0 0 1X 0
Disjoint Props via Disjoint Ranges Sebastian Rudolph Two properties having disjoint domains are necessarily disjoint themselves. Test:DL
Test:FULL
0- 1EL 1RL 0 0 1X 0
DisjointClasses-001 Mike Smith Demonstrates a binary disjoint classes axiom based on example in the Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax document. Test:DL
Test:FULL
0- 0- 1RL 0 0 1X 0
Previous     Results 1– 20     Next        (20 | 50 | 100)
Navigation
OWL 2 Informative
OWL 2 Normative
Toolbox