Property:Test case description

From OWL Test Cases

Jump to:navigation, search

This property specifies a (possibly long) text description of an OWL test case. It thus corresponds to the property test:description (Test case ontology).


(previous 25) (next 25)

Pages using the property "Test case description"

Showing 25 pages using this property.

B

Bnode2somevaluesfrom +Shows that a BNode is an existential variable.

C

Chain2trans +A role chain can be a synonym for transitivity.
Datatype-restrictions-different-types +The individual a must have dp fillers that are in the sets {3, 4} and {2, 3} (different types are used, but shorts and ints are integers). Furthermore, the dp filler must be 3, but since 3 is in both sets, the ontology is consistent.
Double-ranges +The data property dp has a restriction to The data property dp has a restriction to doubles >= 5 (given as byte) and <= 7.2 (given as float) and a restriction to decimals >= 6.0 (given as float) and <= 6.8. The individual a is required to have a dp successor, but there are several double values that fulfil the restriction. double values that fulfil the restriction.
Numeric-restrictions-different-type +The data property dp has a restriction to bytes >= 5 (4.5 needs to be rounded up) and <= 7 and a restriction to decimals >= 6.0 and <= 6.8. The individual a is required to have a dp successor, but 6 is a value that fulfils both restrictions.
Restrictions-different-type +The individual a must have dp fillers that The individual a must have dp fillers that are in the sets {3.0 (float), 4 (integer)} and {3.0 (decimal)} (different types are used, but 3.0 has the same value for floats and decimals). Furthermore, the dp filler must be an integer <= 3, but since 3.0 has the same value as 3 the ontology is consistent. ame value as 3 the ontology is consistent.
Owlreal-plus-oneOf +The individual a must have either negative Infinity or 0 (-0 as integer is 0) as dp fillers and all dp successors must be from owl:real, which excludes negative infinity, but allows 0.
Consistent-but-all-unsat +An ontology that is consistent, but all named classes are unsatisfiable. Ideas by Alan Ruttenberg
Consistent-dataproperty-disjointness +The datatype properties dp1 and dp2 are disjoint, but the individual a can have 10 as a filler for dp1 and 18 as filler for dp2, which satisfies the disjointness.
Consistent-dateTime +The datatype restrictions leave exactly one dateTime value as dp filler for the individual a, so the ontology is consistent.
Consistent-integer-filler +The individual a is in the extension of the class A, which implies that it has a hasAge filler of 18 as integer, which is consistent with the all values from integer assertion for a.
Contradicting-datatype-restrictions +The individual a is in A and thus must have a dp filler that is an integer >= 4. Furthermore the dp fillers must be in the set {3, 4} and in the set {2, 3}. Although 3 is in both sets, 3 is not >= 4, which causes the inconsistency.
Contradicting-dateTime-restrictions +The individual a must have a dp filler that is a date from 2007, but the restrictions on dp allow only values from 2008, which makes the ontology inconsistent.

D

Datatype-DataComplementOf-001 +Demonstrates that the complement of a datatype contains literals from other datatypes.
Datatype-Float-Discrete-001 +The value space of xsd:float is discrete, shown with range defined on 0x00000000 and 0x00000001
Datatype-Float-Discrete-002 +The value space of owl:real is continuous, in contrast with xsd:float
Datatype-restriction-min-max-inconsistency +The individual a is supposed to have an integer dp-successor >= 18, but all dp-successors must be <= 10, which is impossible.
Different-types-plus-complement +The individual a must have dp fillers that are in the sets {3, 4} and {2, 3} (different types are used, but shorts and ints are integers), but at the same time 3 is not allowed as a dp filler for a, which causes the inconsistency.
Different-types +The individual a must have dp fillers that The individual a must have dp fillers that are in the sets {3.0 (double), 4 (integer)} and {2 (integer, 3.0 (decimal)}. The value 3 is the only one that fulfils these constraints, but since a must also have a dp filler that is not 3, the ontology is inconsistent. at is not 3, the ontology is inconsistent.
Direct Semantics Literal disjoint from Thing +A test demonstrating that literals are dis A test demonstrating that literals are disjoint from Thing in the direct semantics. See thread at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2010Oct/0116.html. The following ontology, which is consistent according to the Direct Semantics, demonstrates that literals are not OWL things. In it, owl:Thing is an enumerated class containing at most 2 individuals. One of those individuals has three data property literal values 42,43,44 ^xsd:integer. If the literals were instance of owl:Thing, this ontology would be inconsistent as there can be only two distinct members of owl:Thing, but there are three distinct literals. On the date this test was entered, Pellet and Fact+ correctly determined that the ontology is consistent and Hermit acknowledged that while it found the ontology inconsistent, this was a bug. the ontology inconsistent, this was a bug.
Disjoint Props via Disjoint Domains +Two properties having disjoint domains are necessarily disjoint themselves.
Disjoint Props via Disjoint Ranges +Two properties having disjoint domains are necessarily disjoint themselves.
DisjointClasses-001 +Demonstrates a binary disjoint classes axiom based on example in the Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax document.
DisjointClasses-002 +Demonstrates a binary disjoint classes axiom and class assertions causing an inconsistency based on example in the Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax document.
DisjointClasses-003 +A modification of test DisjointClasses-001 to demonstrate a ternary disjoint classes axiom.
(previous 25) (next 25)
Navigation
OWL 2 Informative
OWL 2 Normative
Toolbox